haganenoneko:

jenihead:

moobleu:

callingoutbigotry:

dimensionsintime:

annespage:


mutantbakabutt:


foreverisreal:


blunts-and-robots:


devils-in-my-head:





this this this this this


if anyone hates me for this you’re not thinking clearly
think about the amount of people killed in the middle east, too ..


lol so edgy xD


the only reason america dropped the atomic bomb was because we were at WAR idiots, if we hadn’t dropped the bomb the war would’ve lasted at lot longer. 9/11 was an act of terrorism, why don’t you go watch a video of the twin towers as they burn after the planes crash into them and later collapse in on themselves burying not only the people that worked there inside, but also the police officers and firefighters who were trying to rescue any survivors, and before they collapsed, when people were forced to choose to burn or jump out to their deaths. so yeah, the atomic bomb killed more people, but one was during WWII and the other was a direct attack of terrorism on America. And the only reason we were at war with Japan was because they attacked us at pearl harbor, if they hadn’t done that the war would’ve stayed in Europe and the atomic bomb wouldn’t have been dropped.


Not even remotely true, but thanks for playing. This misconception largely occurs because of the famous Stimson article that was featured in Harpers’ magazine.
Of course, he didn’t actually WRITE the thing and, though it presents itself as a fireside chat between two people it was actually a heavily engineered document, and almost every fact cited was knowingly wrong by the government at the time (declassified documents - read ‘em). But hey! What better source for info!
That’s neither here nor there though since Japan tried to surrender before we dropped the bomb.
Several Times.
Yes, Japan tried to surrender. Once through Russia, once through Switzerland, once through the Vatican of all places, and many times appealing directly to Truman. We turned them down because of the stipulation that we were not allowed to touch their emperor, a concession the US was not willing to make at the time.


“Foreign Minister Shigemitsu has instructed Ambassador Sato [in Moscow] to find out whether Russia is willing to assist in bringing about a negotiated peace. Shigemitsu’s instructions, although cautiously worded, clearly imply that he has in mind a move by Russia to initiate peace discussions between Japan and the Anglo-Americans… [I]t seems hardly likely that he would have taken such a step without having consulted at least some of the more important members of the new Japanese cabinet… This is the first time that the Japanese have been willing to suggest to Russia directly that they are ready for peace.”
-“Japanese Consider Peace Possibilities” War Department MAGIC reports of intercepted messages: EYES ONLY for President and closest advisers
“I learn from a very reliable source that in important civilian circles in Japan the peace problem is being discussed with increasing anxiety. A speedy German collapse is expected and it is not believed that Japan can then continue the war. It is therefore considered necessary to get peace as soon as possible before the country and towns are destroyed… If any willingness appeared to exist in London the Japanese would be ready for preliminary discussions through Swedish channels. Behind the man who gave me this message stands one of the best known statesmen in Japan and there is no doubt that this attempt must be considered as a serious one.”
-Telegram from Swedish minister in Tokyo given from the British Ambassador to the United States
“…It seems probably that very far-reaching conditions would be accepted by the Japanese by way of negotiation… Exchange of the Japanese constitution must also be considered as excluded. The Emperor must not be touched. However, the Imperial power could be somewhat democratized as is that of the English King”
-Report from Swedish minister in Tokyo sent to US State Department
AND EVEN LATER THEY GAVE THOSE CONDITIONS UP
“…Stated that he had been asked by Masutaro Inoue, Counsellor of the Japanese Legation in Portugal, to contact United States representatives. Source quoted Inoue as saying that the Japanese are ready to cease hostilities, provided they are allowed to retain possession of their home islands… On 19 May [1945], the OSS representative reported Inoue again had repeated to source his desire to talk with an American representative. On this occasion Inoue declared that actual peace terms were unimportant so long as the term ‘unconditional surrender’ was not employed.”
-OSS Representative report directly to Truman


Of course, we did anyway. But that’s not important.
Because the bomb wasn’t about Japan.
In Derry and Ramsey’s Memo to Groves (May 12, 1945) when picking a target for the atomic bomb, one of the primary listed reasons for picking a target was:


“making the initial use sufficiently spectacular for the importance of the weapon to be internationally recognized when publicity on it is released.”


In fact, they ranked targets - AA to B. Know what got the lowest ratings? Military targets. The ones that got the highest ratings were civilian ones.
Japan was currently researching wooden planes. WOODEN PLANES. They had attempted to give up, we said no. They had already lost the war when we dropped the bomb. They knew this - hell, they tried to surrender twice.
So why did we drop the bomb, then?
A close reading of the memo tells all. It was to make an impact on the international community.
Do you know how Truman was first informed about the Manhatten Project and the bomb? It was in a discussion with the Secretary of State in regards to negotiations with Russia after the war.
Truman kept delaying the “Big Three” discussions, the most important political talks in recorded history, until basically the day AFTER the Trinity Tests - he wanted to wait until he knew he had the bomb as a political piece. Stalin and Churchill were VERY angry at him pushing the date back with little to no reason given (they knew, of course, because of spies and intelligence).
Still don’t believe me?
The Secretary of War, and MOST of the army was against dropping the bomb. They wanted to give the option of doing a demonstration and giving Japan an option of total surrender (that we get to do whatever we want with the Emperor) or of giving Japan time to evacuate the civilian population before bombing a city.
Oh, and there’s this from Stimson’s Memo of Talk with Truman (June 6, 1945)


“I told [the President] that I was anxious about this feature of the war for two reasons: first, because I did not want to have the United States get the reputation of outdoing Hitler in atrocities; and second, I was a little fearful that before we could get ready the Air Force might have Japan so thoroughly bombed out that the new weapon would not have a fair background to show its strength. He laughed and said he understood.”


He laughed.
An estimated 500,000 people died between Nagasaki and Hiroshima if you count deaths by radiation poisoning and long-term cancer.
And Truman could only laugh because he was worried the bomb might not be noticeable amongst the wreckage of Japan.
The reason for dropping the bomb was to give America a better condition amongst the international population, particularly Stalin and Russia, in the coming years. It was to make Russia afraid to invade Japan (and from there, the fear was, the rest of Asia) when they knew America had interests in it. They dropped the bomb to give them an advantage when negotiating in the future and to give them a start when everyone began arming (a situation tons of scientists warned everyone about in The Franck Report).
But don’t pretend it was about Japan. And don’t you dare pretend it was about peace.
500,000 people died and all Truman could do was laugh.

YOU JUST GOT HISTORY’D YOU IGNORANT LIL SHIT

wow this is fucked up. i can’t believe we are all so ignorant of the truth. :(

this is how I was taught about the bombings
when i was in high school.

This. Also, I wasn’t aware that when US bombs places our bombs just make people magically stop breathing instead of burning to death or getting crushed by debris. Actually, when Japan was nuked people’s skin melted off and their eyes burst. 

Quite the ruckus when the Smithsonian planned to exhibit the Enola Gay without listing the number of casualties. We dropped the bombs to let Russia know we had the capacity and will to use nuclear weapons. At what point does historical propaganda and misinformation stop being history, even if a majority of US Americans experienced that version as the truth?
Please watch Grave of the Fireflies if you want to know what it was like at the end of the war in Japan.

haganenoneko:

jenihead:

moobleu:

callingoutbigotry:

dimensionsintime:

annespage:

mutantbakabutt:

foreverisreal:

blunts-and-robots:

devils-in-my-head:

image

this this this this this

if anyone hates me for this you’re not thinking clearly

think about the amount of people killed in the middle east, too ..

lol so edgy xD

the only reason america dropped the atomic bomb was because we were at WAR idiots, if we hadn’t dropped the bomb the war would’ve lasted at lot longer. 9/11 was an act of terrorism, why don’t you go watch a video of the twin towers as they burn after the planes crash into them and later collapse in on themselves burying not only the people that worked there inside, but also the police officers and firefighters who were trying to rescue any survivors, and before they collapsed, when people were forced to choose to burn or jump out to their deaths. so yeah, the atomic bomb killed more people, but one was during WWII and the other was a direct attack of terrorism on America. And the only reason we were at war with Japan was because they attacked us at pearl harbor, if they hadn’t done that the war would’ve stayed in Europe and the atomic bomb wouldn’t have been dropped.

Not even remotely true, but thanks for playing. This misconception largely occurs because of the famous Stimson article that was featured in Harpers’ magazine.

Of course, he didn’t actually WRITE the thing and, though it presents itself as a fireside chat between two people it was actually a heavily engineered document, and almost every fact cited was knowingly wrong by the government at the time (declassified documents - read ‘em). But hey! What better source for info!

That’s neither here nor there though since Japan tried to surrender before we dropped the bomb.

Several Times.

Yes, Japan tried to surrender. Once through Russia, once through Switzerland, once through the Vatican of all places, and many times appealing directly to Truman. We turned them down because of the stipulation that we were not allowed to touch their emperor, a concession the US was not willing to make at the time.

“Foreign Minister Shigemitsu has instructed Ambassador Sato [in Moscow] to find out whether Russia is willing to assist in bringing about a negotiated peace. Shigemitsu’s instructions, although cautiously worded, clearly imply that he has in mind a move by Russia to initiate peace discussions between Japan and the Anglo-Americans… [I]t seems hardly likely that he would have taken such a step without having consulted at least some of the more important members of the new Japanese cabinet… This is the first time that the Japanese have been willing to suggest to Russia directly that they are ready for peace.”

-“Japanese Consider Peace Possibilities” War Department MAGIC reports of intercepted messages: EYES ONLY for President and closest advisers

“I learn from a very reliable source that in important civilian circles in Japan the peace problem is being discussed with increasing anxiety. A speedy German collapse is expected and it is not believed that Japan can then continue the war. It is therefore considered necessary to get peace as soon as possible before the country and towns are destroyed… If any willingness appeared to exist in London the Japanese would be ready for preliminary discussions through Swedish channels. Behind the man who gave me this message stands one of the best known statesmen in Japan and there is no doubt that this attempt must be considered as a serious one.”

-Telegram from Swedish minister in Tokyo given from the British Ambassador to the United States

“…It seems probably that very far-reaching conditions would be accepted by the Japanese by way of negotiation… Exchange of the Japanese constitution must also be considered as excluded. The Emperor must not be touched. However, the Imperial power could be somewhat democratized as is that of the English King”

-Report from Swedish minister in Tokyo sent to US State Department

AND EVEN LATER THEY GAVE THOSE CONDITIONS UP

“…Stated that he had been asked by Masutaro Inoue, Counsellor of the Japanese Legation in Portugal, to contact United States representatives. Source quoted Inoue as saying that the Japanese are ready to cease hostilities, provided they are allowed to retain possession of their home islands… On 19 May [1945], the OSS representative reported Inoue again had repeated to source his desire to talk with an American representative. On this occasion Inoue declared that actual peace terms were unimportant so long as the term ‘unconditional surrender’ was not employed.”

-OSS Representative report directly to Truman

Of course, we did anyway. But that’s not important.

Because the bomb wasn’t about Japan.

In Derry and Ramsey’s Memo to Groves (May 12, 1945) when picking a target for the atomic bomb, one of the primary listed reasons for picking a target was:

“making the initial use sufficiently spectacular for the importance of the weapon to be internationally recognized when publicity on it is released.”

In fact, they ranked targets - AA to B. Know what got the lowest ratings? Military targets. The ones that got the highest ratings were civilian ones.

Japan was currently researching wooden planes. WOODEN PLANES. They had attempted to give up, we said no. They had already lost the war when we dropped the bomb. They knew this - hell, they tried to surrender twice.

So why did we drop the bomb, then?

A close reading of the memo tells all. It was to make an impact on the international community.

Do you know how Truman was first informed about the Manhatten Project and the bomb? It was in a discussion with the Secretary of State in regards to negotiations with Russia after the war.

Truman kept delaying the “Big Three” discussions, the most important political talks in recorded history, until basically the day AFTER the Trinity Tests - he wanted to wait until he knew he had the bomb as a political piece. Stalin and Churchill were VERY angry at him pushing the date back with little to no reason given (they knew, of course, because of spies and intelligence).

Still don’t believe me?

The Secretary of War, and MOST of the army was against dropping the bomb. They wanted to give the option of doing a demonstration and giving Japan an option of total surrender (that we get to do whatever we want with the Emperor) or of giving Japan time to evacuate the civilian population before bombing a city.

Oh, and there’s this from Stimson’s Memo of Talk with Truman (June 6, 1945)

“I told [the President] that I was anxious about this feature of the war for two reasons: first, because I did not want to have the United States get the reputation of outdoing Hitler in atrocities; and second, I was a little fearful that before we could get ready the Air Force might have Japan so thoroughly bombed out that the new weapon would not have a fair background to show its strength. He laughed and said he understood.”

He laughed.

An estimated 500,000 people died between Nagasaki and Hiroshima if you count deaths by radiation poisoning and long-term cancer.

And Truman could only laugh because he was worried the bomb might not be noticeable amongst the wreckage of Japan.

The reason for dropping the bomb was to give America a better condition amongst the international population, particularly Stalin and Russia, in the coming years. It was to make Russia afraid to invade Japan (and from there, the fear was, the rest of Asia) when they knew America had interests in it. They dropped the bomb to give them an advantage when negotiating in the future and to give them a start when everyone began arming (a situation tons of scientists warned everyone about in The Franck Report).

But don’t pretend it was about Japan. And don’t you dare pretend it was about peace.

500,000 people died and all Truman could do was laugh.

YOU JUST GOT HISTORY’D YOU IGNORANT LIL SHIT

wow this is fucked up. i can’t believe we are all so ignorant of the truth. :(

this is how I was taught about the bombings

when i was in high school.

This. Also, I wasn’t aware that when US bombs places our bombs just make people magically stop breathing instead of burning to death or getting crushed by debris. Actually, when Japan was nuked people’s skin melted off and their eyes burst. 

Quite the ruckus when the Smithsonian planned to exhibit the Enola Gay without listing the number of casualties. We dropped the bombs to let Russia know we had the capacity and will to use nuclear weapons. At what point does historical propaganda and misinformation stop being history, even if a majority of US Americans experienced that version as the truth?

Please watch Grave of the Fireflies if you want to know what it was like at the end of the war in Japan.

[x]

Stop that.

Is this a heavenly horse?

Is this a heavenly horse?

(via Tiger Horse Breed’s Standards and Appaloosa Coat Patterns)
It’s about time someone recreated the T’ang Dynasty horse! There is a long history of powerful militaries, including the United States, Russia, and China, attempting to stamp out this lineage because its endurance, courage and loyalty made it a liability to conquerors. 
Modern Appaloosas have had all the gait bred out of them and are basically Quarter Horses with spots. The Heavenly Horse, or Ghost Horses as native Americans called them, have a gait called the Indian Shuffle that allows them to move swiftly and easily to cover ground without stress to them or the rider. 
The horse is called “Tiger” because 11th c. Europe did not have a word for leopard. Traced back to the Spanish Jennet, these naturally gaited horses would have been of no use to dressage schools, but perfect for long tours on rough terrain, explaining their arrival to the Americas. 
Just as the Chinese stole the horses from the steppes of Asia to guarantee victory, the Russians attempted to squash the breed, just as the Untited States did when gold was found in California.
Out of fragments that the modern Appaloosa breed didn’t want, it has been discovered that white “Ghost Horses” with very few spots are the ones who carry the dominant leopard gene, as well as being likely carriers of the smooth running walk.
These heavenly horses did not escape the fight to terminate them, but in selective breeding these traits are being brought back out, a most worthy cause.

(via Tiger Horse Breed’s Standards and Appaloosa Coat Patterns)

It’s about time someone recreated the T’ang Dynasty horse! There is a long history of powerful militaries, including the United States, Russia, and China, attempting to stamp out this lineage because its endurance, courage and loyalty made it a liability to conquerors. 

Modern Appaloosas have had all the gait bred out of them and are basically Quarter Horses with spots. The Heavenly Horse, or Ghost Horses as native Americans called them, have a gait called the Indian Shuffle that allows them to move swiftly and easily to cover ground without stress to them or the rider. 

The horse is called “Tiger” because 11th c. Europe did not have a word for leopard. Traced back to the Spanish Jennet, these naturally gaited horses would have been of no use to dressage schools, but perfect for long tours on rough terrain, explaining their arrival to the Americas. 

Just as the Chinese stole the horses from the steppes of Asia to guarantee victory, the Russians attempted to squash the breed, just as the Untited States did when gold was found in California.

Out of fragments that the modern Appaloosa breed didn’t want, it has been discovered that white “Ghost Horses” with very few spots are the ones who carry the dominant leopard gene, as well as being likely carriers of the smooth running walk.

These heavenly horses did not escape the fight to terminate them, but in selective breeding these traits are being brought back out, a most worthy cause.

Sea The Stars - 2009 Prix de l’Arc - ISO Camera (by shalakhani)

The Blood-horse.

There is a story in Chinese history about the effort to bring the “blood-sweat horses” into the service of the Emperor. This is a story about the Tsui family who came to breed and race the best horse of a generation, their own Horse of 1000 Miles.

lushbitch:

dzhokhar420:

ummyeaahh:

My wallpaper <3 
No regrets…jus luv
Jahar don’t caaar!

o  mmmm    fffff ggggg i cant

omg

lushbitch:

dzhokhar420:

ummyeaahh:

My wallpaper <3 

No regrets…jus luv

Jahar don’t caaar!

o  mmmm    fffff ggggg i cant

omg

People who have read the books and don’t hide spoilers behind page breaks

lachau:

if you post season 3 game of thrones spoilers and don’t tag them as spoilers i will fucking murder you

(via #FreeJahar: When Conspiracy Theorists and One Direction Fans Collide)

poorgirlporvida:

stfuconservatives:

After I mentioned that Exxon was controlling the airspace above the Arkansas spill, I got a fiery Ask accusing me of spreading conspiracy theories because only the FAA controlled airspace. My mistake: the FAA is controlling the airspace above the spill, per Exxon’s request.

In case you didn’t know that this has been happening, too. America, you sure are keeping it classy these days.

House Tully

54% Stark,  23% Lannister,  45% Baratheon,  82% Tully,  43% Tyrell,  43% Martell,  38% Targaryen,  12% Greyjoy and  43% Arryn!

  • Place high value on honesty and honor
  • Stubborn
  • Strong interest in doing the right thing
  • See clear distinction between right and wrong
  • Place family needs above personal needs
  • Extremely protective and loyal toward family and friends
  • Blunt, and prefers when people are blunt with them

I don’t even know who House Tully is … I am a fish?